On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Hauke Fath wrote:

>> My tests on a dual SS-10 with a current kernel don't panic.  I haven't
>> verified the panic without the patch, but it is clear in the code.
>
> Would I need a -current kernel for verifying that, or does a netbsd-3
> kernel suffice? My ss10 is running 2.0 stable.

Right now the fix is only on -current, though I'll package it up for 
netbsd-3 shortly.  The fix for this case is rev 1.140 of 
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c , which pulls up to the netbsd-3 branch without 
difficulty; or if you like you can wait for me and releng a bit, and test 
again once it's in the branch :^)

Take care,
 						Konrad Schroder
 						perseant@hhhh.org