Subject: Re: kern/29600: cbb(4) hangs on boot
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: FUKAUMI Naoki <fun@naobsd.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 03/12/2005 08:40:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/29600; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: FUKAUMI Naoki <fun@naobsd.org>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>, gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/29600: cbb(4) hangs on boot
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:39:32 +0900
At Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:24:17 +0900,
FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> > > We don't have any reason to wait value is changed in while() loop.
> > >
> > > tsleep() will be awakened if power cycle event occured. There is no
> > > reason to check sc_pwrcycle value.
> >
> > i think
> > while (condition) {
> > sleep();
> > }
> > is a common convention to prevent spurious wakeups.
>
> hmm....
>
> Is it possible to awake tsleep($sc->sc_pwrcycle) by another place?
> (i.e. except wakeup(&sc->sc_pwrcycle))
How to handle "condition is never changed" case?
How to handle "sleep() is never awakened" case?
I can't give answers.
# Maybe, reverting rev. 1.111 and 1.112 is one of the answer. ;)
--
FUKAUMI Naoki