Subject: Re: kern/29544
To: None <thorpej@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 03/06/2005 00:45:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/29544; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
To: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Cc: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>, thorpej@netbsd.org,
gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/29544
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:44:42 -0800
On Mar 5, 2005, at 3:47 PM, john heasley wrote:
> gah. I do not see how the header length could be missing from
> csum_data.
> Perhaps you wouldn't mind adding a printf to see if it actually is
> unset?
Yes, this is a good thing to do.
> otherwise, I suspect it is particular to the chip you have and that the
> complete ip header might not be in the first dma segment (if that is in
> fact possible)? That could be tested by putting the m_pullup back.
Ew.
> Anyone have a pointer to docs for this chip? my googling came-up
> empty.
> perhaps docs are under another version #?
Docs for these Intel chips are NDA-only.
-- thorpej