Subject: Re: kern/29544
To: None <thorpej@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 03/06/2005 00:45:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/29544; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
To: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Cc: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>, thorpej@netbsd.org,
	gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/29544
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:44:42 -0800

 On Mar 5, 2005, at 3:47 PM, john heasley wrote:
 
 > gah.  I do not see how the header length could be missing from 
 > csum_data.
 > Perhaps you wouldn't mind adding a printf to see if it actually is 
 > unset?
 
 Yes, this is a good thing to do.
 
 > otherwise, I suspect it is particular to the chip you have and that the
 > complete ip header might not be in the first dma segment (if that is in
 > fact possible)?  That could be tested by putting the m_pullup back.
 
 Ew.
 
 > Anyone have a pointer to docs for this chip?  my googling came-up 
 > empty.
 > perhaps docs are under another version #?
 
 Docs for these Intel chips are NDA-only.
 
 -- thorpej