On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:50:44 +0200, Arto Selonen wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> 
>> not that big, it is usually easy to fix in a few days. Of course we have the
>> ipfs issue that we have not been able to get working reliably yet... But that
>> is another story. For the most part now ipf imports fix things and have more
>> fixes that regressions, so they are worth doing.
> 
> Well, ipfs is a low priority, nice to have type of an extension.
> But ipfilter4 in NetBSD is still trying to get to where ipfilter3 was.
> Many of version 4 features remain undocumented, and hence probably do not

Exactly!

Also the IPFilter web pages don't care much about ipfilter4. e.g.
changelogs are only for ipfilter 3.4 .

Bye	pavel