Subject: kern/28976: Re: kern/28976: pool ipqepl: putting with none out, panic: pool_put,
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/19/2005 20:55:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/28976; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Greg A. Woods" <email@example.com>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD GNATS submissions and followups <email@example.com>,
NetBSD Bugs and PR posting List <netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: kern/28976: pool ipqepl: putting with none out, panic: pool_put,
in tcp_reass() (netbsd-1-6)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:54:07 -0500 (EST)
[ On Monday, January 17, 2005 at 08:27:07 (+0900), YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: kern/28976: pool ipqepl: putting with none out, panic: pool_put, in tcp_reass() (netbsd-1-6)
> > >Number: 28976
> > >Category: kern
> > >Synopsis: pool ipqepl: putting with none out, panic: pool_put, in tcp_reass() (netbsd-1-6)
> > google doesn't seem to know anything about this kind of panic,
> > and I don't think I've ever seen anything like it before either...
> did you try a patch i've mailed you for PR/24782 ?
Yes, in fact that's the only significant networking change I've made to
the kernel on that system recently.
Do you think the patch could be a possible cause of this problem?
I have not yet built a kernel with that change for my alpha or sparc
systems, which may explain why none of them have suffered a similar
panic, yet this i386 system has now suffered a second identical panic
even while it was mostly idle (though it may have been port scanned or
such as it is internet accessible and only partly protected by a very
Greg A. Woods
H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com> Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>