Subject: re: install/28400
To: James Chacon <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/25/2004 17:22:53
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:53:53AM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> Synopsis: latest change to use NetBSD logos in xdm was apparently not tested on 1.6.x
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: email@example.com
> State-Changed-When: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:18:37 +0000
> xsrc on 1.6 has it's own branch and is maintained there. If you want to use
> the -current xsrc that's fine, but there are no guarentees for it to work with
> the branch "as-is". The branched xsrc for 1.6 does build fine.
> hmm? xsrc has always supposed to be portable to the previous release.
> the xsrc branches are for specific releases, and are not maintained
> really beyond that.
> i think this PR should be re-opened and fixed.
This is a set list problem (from reading the original PR). That never gets
maintained as -current set lists match -current. Changing distrib/... on
the 1.6 branch to match anything except the 1.6 branched tree's is just
oh i see. yeah, i agree. i was thinking xsrc could be changed to
suit, but that's not really the case...