Subject: toolchain/23644: new binutils may or may not need shlib_version updates
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: None <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 12/04/2003 14:13:41
>Number: 23644
>Category: toolchain
>Synopsis: may or may not need shlib_version updates
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: high
>Responsible: toolchain-manager
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Dec 04 03:14:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: matthew green
>Release: NetBSD 1.6P
>Organization:
people's front against (bozotic) www (softwar foundation)
>Environment:
System: NetBSD splode.eterna.com.au 1.6P NetBSD 1.6P (_splode_) #30: Sat Mar 15 00:15:28 EST 2003 mrg@what-time-is-love.eterna.com.au:/var/_splode_ sparc64
Architecture: sparc
Machine: sparc64
>Description:
i just realised i didn't check whether libbfd.so and libopcodes.so
need to be versioned in any way.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
check whether libbfd and/or libopcodes need shlib_version changes.
this is a reminder so i don't forget to do this Soon.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: