Subject: toolchain/23644: new binutils may or may not need shlib_version updates
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: None <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 12/04/2003 14:13:41
>Number:         23644
>Category:       toolchain
>Synopsis:       may or may not need shlib_version updates
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    toolchain-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Dec 04 03:14:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     matthew green
>Release:        NetBSD 1.6P
>Organization:
people's front against (bozotic) www (softwar foundation)
>Environment:
	
	
System: NetBSD splode.eterna.com.au 1.6P NetBSD 1.6P (_splode_) #30: Sat Mar 15 00:15:28 EST 2003 mrg@what-time-is-love.eterna.com.au:/var/_splode_ sparc64
Architecture: sparc
Machine: sparc64
>Description:

	i just realised i didn't check whether libbfd.so and libopcodes.so
	need to be versioned in any way.

>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:

	check whether libbfd and/or libopcodes need shlib_version changes.

	this is a reminder so i don't forget to do this Soon.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: