Subject: misc/23400: grohtml.{0,1} built/installed, but listed as obsolete
To: None <gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org>
From: None <jbernard@mines.edu>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 11/09/2003 13:05:27
>Number:         23400
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       grohtml.{0,1} built/installed, but listed as obsolete
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    misc-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Nov 09 20:06:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jim Bernard
>Release:        NetBSD 1.6ZE
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: NetBSD knox 1.6ZE NetBSD 1.6ZE (KNOX-$Revision: 1.3 $) #0: Wed Nov 5 14:47:55 MST 2003 jim@roc:/wd1/var/tmp/compile/sys/arch/i386/compile/KNOX i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:
	The /etc/postinstall script reports that /usr/share/man/man1/grohtml.1
	and /usr/share/man/cat1/grohtml.0 are obsolete (per specification
	in usr/src/distrib/sets/lists/text/mi), but these files were freshly
	built with the current installation.

>How-To-Repeat:
	Build/install userland; note presence of freshly built grohtml.{0,1}.
	Run /etc/postinstall (or read /var/db/obsolete/text) and note that
	these files are listed as obsolete.

>Fix:
	Either change the Makefile(s) not to build/install the files
	(usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/ ...), or change the
	obsolete list not to include them.  FWIW, /usr/bin/grohtml is
	no longer installed, so I guess the obsolete list is correct.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: