Subject: Re: bin/21519: /bin/ls change broke /etc/security
To: Geoff Wing <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
Date: 05/14/2003 00:19:32
>Hmm, yes, you're right. It should be ls which is fixed, not /etc/security
i beg to differ. i think both should be fixed. why is /etc/security
using -g at all?
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
firstname.lastname@example.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
email@example.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
firstname.lastname@example.org * "information is power -- share the wealth."