Subject: Re: bin/19903: top on sparc64 uses huge amounts of cpu time
To: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
From: Chuck Silvers <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/20/2003 22:16:30
> Most (all?) other pmaps keep the pm_stats counters up-to-date and simply
> return that counter instead of calculating them on the fly. Should the
> sparc64 pmap do this too?
yea, tracking both the resident count and wired count would be fine.
this shouldn't be hard so I'll leave the implementation to someone with
more time than I have these days. :-)