Subject: Re: standards/19644: star should become standard tar
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Anthraxz __ <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/02/2003 20:22:24
>From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <email@example.com>
>CC: firstname.lastname@example.org, <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: standards/19644: star should become standard tar
>Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:27:06 -0800 (PST)
>On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > star
> > should become the standard tar on Gentoo. GNU tar has lots of known bugs
> > and it's just ugly (moreover, the project seems dead ...). No one is
> > able to maintain GNU tar right because it's an ugly hack, not beiing
> > POSIX compliant and not even generating correct tar archives by default.
> > star does all this better and has ACL support additionally ...
>Did you mean to say that star is the standard tar on Gentoo?
Sorry, my english is a little poor ... I mean to say I had hear that there
are somes discution in Gentoo to replace GNU tar by star. I'm not sure, but
I think that star should be a good candidate for the standard tar in netbsd,
since it support gnu tar, ansi tar, POSIX.1-2001 PAX and Sun's Solaris tar.
I think that star is simply superior to all others tar implementation (but
this is my own opinion ...)
>This is not the Gentoo problem report database -- this is NetBSD
>The stardard tar is now a pax derivative. This pax has a BSD license.
>star is GPL'd. star is already available in the pkgsrc collection in the
>archivers category. (star does look interesting: I plan on giving it a
>try. Thanks for the pointer.)
> Jeremy C. Reed
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !