Subject: Re: bin/17546: vi bug fixes and extensions
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 07/10/2002 16:47:47
--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Replies to this should probably remove gnats-bugs from the
recipient list unless it's something that really ought to be in the
GNATS DB. Yes, I think the first thing here should.]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:43:54AM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> 	yes, you should contact nvi/vim authors instead.

The actual bugfix in this PR should, of course, probably be
committed. (It's just the feature additions I was taking issue with.)

> 	btw, what happened to AT&T license source code made public under
> 	BSD license?  I would like to see REAL vi (with lisp mode) in the
> 	system if possible :-)

As I recall, vi has encumberments outside of AT&T, but I don't
remember the details and could be remembering wrong.

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9LJ1y9ehacAz5CRoRAnQiAKCK5fqD0xYZ+zT8jrTT3JkToAJVHwCgjbCK
nt2/XvGlRr3prWj/ceRCVrg=
=ocYL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--