Subject: RE: install/17081: install on small drive doesn't create /tmp
To: None <netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org>
From: Jonathan Cline <JCline@globespanvirata.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 05/28/2002 21:29:27
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manuel Bouyer [mailto:bouyer@antioche.eu.org]

> > > From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:reed@reedmedia.net]
> > >=20
> > > > What I noticed, post-install, was that there was no /tmp.
> > >=20
> > > > It didn't make a /var either, but not all systems have /var,
> > >=20
> > > Then did you select and install the "base.tgz" set?
> > >=20
> > > It contains the /tmp and /var directories (that are put on your /
> > > partition).
> > >=20
> > >    Jeremy C. Reed
> > >    http://www.reedmedia.net/
> > >=20
> > >=20
> >=20
>=20
> It wouldn't either work without /tmp or /var, so I suspect something
> deleted these directories.
>=20
> --=20
> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
> --

I just installed 1.5.3_RC2 on a different machine, similar
config, and haven't seen this problem.  So perhaps I was=20
nodding off at the time.  Not sure why I always hack unix=20
really late at night.  Though, I've still linked /tmp into=20
/usr/tmp, where I think it lives best.  If /usr is unmountable=20
on this single drive (ex. if corruption occurs), I'm not=20
sure I'd need /tmp since I'd be in a world of hurt anyway.
A /tmp of 200megs is no /tmp at all.

So unless someone else complains about an odd behavior
like this, I'll blame this bug on myself.


******************Legal Disclaimer**************************
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole u=
se of the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use or distribution=
 by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have received the message in err=
or, please advise the sender by reply email @globespanvirata.com, and delet=
e the message. Thank you."
****************************************************************