>>>>> gabriel rosenkoetter writes:

gabriel> Doesn't issue of SIGWINCH require an active TTY?

I don't know. That's why I wrote "maybe?". ;-)

gabriel> Not sure just feeding it /dev/null will fix anything. Have
gabriel> you tried? (If so... should it?)

The patch makes the problem go away, but if it isn't correct I guess
the package should be marked IS_INTERACTIVE instead. But that seems a
bit unnecesary.

Regards,

        -- Urban