Subject: Re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
To: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 05/25/2001 17:22:29
[ On Friday, May 25, 2001 at 11:30:24 (-0500), Frederick Bruckman wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
> I think it's not productive to keep some of those old PR's open. I'm
> thinking of crashes that ocurred with particular hardware at some time
> in the distant past, and other things, too. I'm not suggesting we
> sweep anything under the rug, but if a PR can't conceivably trigger
> some clear course of action, we should just close it.
Those should be marked as "suspended".
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>