Subject: Re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
To: Petri Koistinen <email@example.com>
From: Richard Earnshaw <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/25/2001 15:18:22
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Todd Vierling wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Petri Koistinen wrote:
> > : Well, but the submitter of PR doesn't get any confirmation that somebody
> > : has realy readed her/his PR and started to work on it.
> > This is what the "analyzed" PR state is intended to cover.
> Yes, but it apparently doesn't work, there is 1923 open PRs against 136
> analyzed PRs (25 May 2001 12:46:43 GMT). Submitted status would act like
> a filter before open status.
I doubt it. If people don't move PRs from open to analysed, why should
they start doing it for submitted->open? All you've done is renamed open