Subject: Re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Doran <email@example.com>
Date: 05/25/2001 13:41:01
matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> i'm still not convinced a new state is necessary. given that when
> people decide they are working on a PR they are to assign that PR
> to themselves (thus away from the catch-all assignee's), i don't
> see the point of "submitted". who changes submitted to open but
> wouldn't also assign it to themselves? i can't see that ever
> really being the case.
I agree. It, and this whole thread, seem like a pointless waste of energy.