Subject: re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
To: matthew green <>
From: Petri Koistinen <>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 05/24/2001 13:22:08
On Thu, 24 May 2001, matthew green wrote:

> i'm not sure that gnats supports what you're asking for. have you
> checked that this is actually possible?

There is open, analyzed, feedback, closed, suspended already available,
what is so different with submitted. Shouldn't be that hard to add.
> i'm also not convinced it is really useful, and it makes our gnats
> PR database different to almost everyone else's.

Not that much diffent. What's wrong in improving system? Why do we need
database similar than others.