Subject: re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
To: matthew green <email@example.com>
From: Petri Koistinen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/24/2001 13:22:08
On Thu, 24 May 2001, matthew green wrote:
> i'm not sure that gnats supports what you're asking for. have you
> checked that this is actually possible?
There is open, analyzed, feedback, closed, suspended already available,
what is so different with submitted. Shouldn't be that hard to add.
> i'm also not convinced it is really useful, and it makes our gnats
> PR database different to almost everyone else's.
Not that much diffent. What's wrong in improving system? Why do we need
database similar than others.