Subject: Re: PRs should first have submitted status rather than open
To: Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>
From: Petri Koistinen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/23/2001 09:00:57
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:20:34PM +0300, Petri Koistinen wrote:
> > So new PR states should be
> > submitted
> > assigned
> > Analyzed, feedback, closed and suspended status codes should be preserved
> > as they are now.
> > This change would clarify the current situtation. People who submit PRs
> > could clearly see that solving of their PRs has started. Maintainers
> > would have better view on which PRs are actually under work.
> no need for this; checking the responsible field should be enouth.
> If nooone changes the responsible field when someone starts working on the
> PR, I can't see why someone would change the status field :)
But it harder to see in statics which PRs are open and nothing is done for
them and which realy are under work.