When I originally post to gnats (via send-pr) or email to 
gnats-bugs@gnats.netbsd.org. The message gets added to the netbsd-bugs
archive and a problem report webpage is generated.

It seems like sometimes when I reply, it does not get appended to the
problem report webpage and a new message is not sent to netbsd-bugs.

For example:
 http://www.NetBSD.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=11975
(It also in the netbsd-bugs archive.)

I replied twice to gnats-admin. Shouldn't it be added to the problem
report webpage? What about being sent to the netbsd-bugs?

Or should I reply (add my details) a different way? Should I email to
gnats-bugs instead?

My two replies below:

From reed@reedmedia.net Fri Feb  2 12:06:52 2001
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:28:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
To: gnats-admin@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/11975: time(1) manpage not clear - patch included

Forget about the grammar part! I guess my bachelor's degree in journalism
doesn't help :)

"contents .. are" is correct.

This is a patch to the previous bin/11975 patch.

--- time.1      Tue Jan 16 14:49:32 2001
+++ time.1-2    Tue Jan 16 15:27:49 2001
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 .Ar utility
 process'
 .Em rusage
-structure is printed. (See below.)
+structure are printed. (See below.)
 .It Fl p
 The output is formatted as specified by
 .St -p1003.2-92 .


   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/


From reed@reedmedia.net Fri Feb  2 12:09:22 2001
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:38:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
To: hubertf@netbsd.org
Cc: gnats-admin@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/11975

On 26 Jan 2001 hubertf@netbsd.org wrote:

> Synopsis: time.1 manual not clear, missing information
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: hubertf
> State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 26 10:56:46 PST 2001
> State-Changed-Why: 
> 
> Patches applied, thanks a lot!

Thanks! It does have one problem. I sent the following email, but it never
made it (at least it isn't archived one the mailing list or with the
problem report):

Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:28:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
To: gnats-admin@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/11975: time(1) manpage not clear - patch included

Forget about the grammar part! I guess my bachelor's degree in journalism
doesn't help :)

"contents .. are" is correct.

This is a patch to the previous bin/11975 patch.

--- time.1      Tue Jan 16 14:49:32 2001
+++ time.1-2    Tue Jan 16 15:27:49 2001
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 .Ar utility
 process'
 .Em rusage
-structure is printed. (See below.)
+structure are printed. (See below.)
 .It Fl p
 The output is formatted as specified by
 .St -p1003.2-92 .


   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/


   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://www.reedmedia.net/