>> >We don't have to provide dlopen()-less library for dynamically linked
>> >binaries for same reason.
>> 	again, if we ship libnolocale.a for statically linked binaries,
>Even if we ship libnolocale.a, the library is stopgap, and will be
>removed when dlopen(3) is available on static binaries.
>> 	people can use it for dynamically linked binary as well!
>There is no reason to do so, when dlopen(3) is available on static
>binaries, as I repeatedly said.

	you don't have reason, i don't have reason, we cannot insist it to
	other people.  the discussion should end here.

itojun