>I'm not sure which is better.
>It seems only /bin/ls and /bin/date need multibyte locale for now.
>(although I may miss some....)

	we don't have LC_TIME support yet.

>> 	- dynamic linked library, but wants no multilingual locale code to be
>> 	  included
>Mmm.
>If dynamically linked binaries always call dlopen(3) for multibyte
>locale module, there is no code bloat for dynamically linked modules.
>Isn't it?

	some people want to have a way to avoid even the *possibility*
	of dlopen.
	
itojun