On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 07:36:11PM +0000, David Brownlee wrote:
> > Imho the semantics of -a in mount should be changed accordingly to the
> > one of umount.
> 
> 	Please do not do this . You could set them not noauto and 'mount
> 	-vat nonfs' to avoid hitting them in startup.

> 
> 	I would fully support having a different flag that implies
> 	'include type type noauto' in current operation :)


I thought of this too. But then again, the semantic of "-a" is 
different in mount and umount.

-- 
          See <a href="http://www.netbsd.org">NetBSD</a> for a multiplatform OS
2 + 2, Sie stoehnt dabei         - auf dem Wasserbett und die ganze Nacht