On Thu 30 Sep, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> Rock Ridge, for instance, adds a bunch of "stuff" and even causes file
> name munging (ooh, ahh!).  "why couldn't people just use native
> ISO-9660!"  (Yes, it's a useful, popular format.  but then, it sounds
> like the acorn changes are useful and popular in the circles in which
> you swim...)
> 
> Are the changes and other specialness documented by some external
> authority?  If so, that probably ought to be cited.

They are documented, but are not publically available. My data
was from sections 5.3.5 and 5.3.6 in the Acorn CDFS functional
specification (CDFS is the Acorn RISCOS equivalent of cd9600).

-- 
Dr. Stephen Borrill, Director and Principal Engineer
Precedence Technologies Ltd             Tel: +44 (0) 1223 562 500
86 Kings Hedges Road                    Fax: +44 (0) 1223 563 522
Cambridge, CB4 2PA, United Kingdom      WWW: http://www.precedence.co.uk/