Subject: kern/5139: 'de' driver prints weird media notice on DEC Celebris
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <cgd@NetBSD.ORG>
Date: 03/09/1998 16:49:33
>Synopsis: 'de' driver prints weird media notice on DEC Celebris
>Responsible: kern-bug-people (Kernel Bug People)
>Arrival-Date: Mon Mar 9 17:05:00 1998
>Originator: Chris G. Demetriou
Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
>Release: NetBSD-current as of Mar 9, 1998
System: NetBSD brick.int.demetriou.com 1.3D NetBSD 1.3D (BRICK) #36: Wed Feb 18 21:00:25 PST 1998 email@example.com:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/BRICK i386
System actually being tested is running a kernel built from today's
(March 9th's) sources.
[ filed as 'kern' rather than port-i386 because it's a problem
with an MI driver. ]
I've got a DEC Celebris GL 6180 (short tower), that appears to
have a built in 21142 ethernet.
On boot, the 'de' driver prints:
de0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0de0: can't find phy 0
de0: interrupting at irq 9
de0: DEC 21142 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.1
de0: address 00:00:f8:03:93:5a
At the very least, the printf formatting is losing. At worst,
there's some kind of bug in the driver; it seems ... odd (but
not impossible 8-) to me that a Digital system would trigger
this warning (which seems to be more of a debugging message
than anything else) by having a bogus ethernet ROM.
It's also worth noting that the autoconfiguration output claims
"10-100Mb/s", but 'ifconfig -m de0' says:
de0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active
supported media: autoselect 10base5/AUI 10base2/BNC 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
inet 220.127.116.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 18.104.22.168
If 100Mb/s operation is dependant on a PHY which is missing (?!),
then should the driver really be claiming 10-100Mb/s at boot?
Boot a NetBSD/i386 kernel containing the 'de' driver on a Digital
Celebris GL 6180 (short tower). (That might have to be a Celebris
GL 6180 short tower without the 100Mb/s option; it appears that
there's an add-in card for 100Mb/s operation.)
Look at the autoconfiguration output, compare it to the 'ifconfig
-m' output for the interface.
The autoconfig 'prettyness' problem can probably be fixed by
some careful manipulation of the driver's printfs.
I don't know what the deal with the PHY is, but printing
the correct set of supported speeds at boot time probably wouldn't
be too hard.