On Tue, 18 Feb 1997 00:38:38 -0800 
 Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:

 > How about the alternative:
 > 
 > 	net.inet.ip.drop.src-rt
 > 
 > I find the `drop' names reflect the intent more clearly.  It's more
 > extensible and consisent with, e.g., ip_fil usage, too.  
 > Is there any other IP traffic that one would want toggles to drop?

I don't really like that name... because it's unlikely that very many
things would actually be placed under the "drop" level, and the granularity
isn't fine enough, IMO, for general-purpose drop rules.

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939