Subject: Re: misc/3212: Source routing configuration problem
To: Jonathan Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 02/18/1997 14:45:31
On Tue, 18 Feb 1997 00:38:38 -0800
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> How about the alternative:
> I find the `drop' names reflect the intent more clearly. It's more
> extensible and consisent with, e.g., ip_fil usage, too.
> Is there any other IP traffic that one would want toggles to drop?
I don't really like that name... because it's unlikely that very many
things would actually be placed under the "drop" level, and the granularity
isn't fine enough, IMO, for general-purpose drop rules.
Jason R. Thorpe firstname.lastname@example.org
NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939