Subject: Re: proposed kernel change for IP_HDRINCL
To: Bill Fenner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matthias Urlichs <email@example.com>
Date: 10/20/1996 23:28:53
Bill Fenner wrote:
>In message <QAA01789.firstname.lastname@example.org> you write:
>>Currently, when using setsockopt() with the IP_HDRINCL flag, most
>>fields of the IP header are passed into the kernel in network byte
>>order, except for the ip_off and ip_len fields.
>I think that there should be a standard macro defined in <netinet/ip.h>
>that says whether or not this change is in the kernel, so that people
>don't have to send themselves a packet to see whether the kernel byte
>swaps or not.
>Do you have any desire to do anything about raw_input as well? Various
>fields are messed with on the way in, too.
IMHO, a raw packet should be a _raw_ packet. That means that the kernel
shouldn't fiddle with _anything_.
FWIW, Linux does things the "really raw" way, too; thus, programs which
rely on these things already have the required patches, these days.
Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
-- Marechal Ferdinand Foch, Professor of Strategy,
Ecole Superieure de Guerre
Matthias Urlichs \ noris network GmbH / Xlink-POP Nürnberg
Schleiermacherstraße 12 \ Linux+Internet / EMail: email@example.com
90491 Nürnberg (Germany) \ Consulting+Programming+Networking+etc'ing
PGP: 1024/4F578875 1B 89 E2 1C 43 EA 80 44 15 D2 29 CF C6 C7 E0 DE
Click here. 42