In article <199603202232.RAA02944@Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>,
der Mouse  <mouse@Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> wrote:
> > invertable, and iso8859-1<->iso-636-xx almost never works)
> 
> You probably mean ISO-646, not 636.  (ISO 636 is a standard for "Bare
> solid filler rods for oxy-acetylene and tungsten inert gas arc (TIG)
> welding, depositing an unalloyed or low alloyed steel", according to

What, are you disputing that conversion between iso8859-1 and bare
solid filler rods almost never works? :-) Sounds like it's a true
statement to me. ;-)