Subject: CDDL (was Re: Star & NetBSD)
To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
From: Alec Berryman <alec@thened.net>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/10/2005 16:41:47
--s9fJI615cBHmzTOP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Joerg Schilling on 2005-02-10 22:24:00 +0100:

> >   * I'm not convinced the CDDL is free of problems. I know you thinkg
> >     different, and I'd really love to hear more opinions on this (should
> >     probaby be discussed on this list).
>=20
> You most likely did not yet read enough about the CDDL and it's intention=
s.
>=20
> http://www.opensolaris.org/faq/licensing_faq.html
>=20
> The CDDL is compatible to the BSD license in both directions.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3.1. Availability of Source Code.

Any Covered Software that You distribute or otherwise make available
in Executable form must also be made available in Source Code form and
that Source Code form must be distributed only under the terms of this
License. You must include a copy of this License with every copy of
the Source Code form of the Covered Software You distribute or
otherwise make available. You must inform recipients of any such
Covered Software in Executable form as to how they can obtain such
Covered Software in Source Code form in a reasonable manner on or
through a medium customarily used for software exchange.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

I don't understand how that section is compatible with the BSD license
in both directions.

--s9fJI615cBHmzTOP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCC9UbAud/2YgchcQRArMgAJ9xzmjSEZl9RvPxkFYkFtTTwjaI6QCgwI71
mrauY4VdAhwVYpaCPRJtZf4=
=WDPD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--s9fJI615cBHmzTOP--