Subject: Re: NetBSD 2.0 test drive at HP site
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Ben Collver <collver@peak.org>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 02/05/2005 06:16:53
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:01:06PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> I'll take the liberty to append a bit more information, as it's not only 
> interesting to see the two CPUs used, but also the onboard RAID 
> controller:
> 
> $ top
> load averages:  0.46,  0.21,  0.12                                   07:55:02
> 30 processes:  28 sleeping, 2 on processor
> CPU0 states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% idle
> CPU1 states:  100% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  0.0% idle
> Memory: 19M Act, 548K Wired, 2552K Exec, 14M File, 1957M Free
> Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
> 
>   PID USERNAME PRI NICE   SIZE   RES STATE      TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
>  1819 hubertf   53    0   128K  580K CPU/0      0:21 97.50% 65.09% sh
>  1804 hubertf   18    0   220K  756K pause/3    0:09  8.79%  8.79% ksh
>     9 root      18    0     0K   40M syncer/3   0:07  0.00%  0.00% [ioflush]
>  1590 hubertf   28    0   264K 1040K CPU/3      0:00  0.00%  0.00% top
>  1663 hubertf   18    0   196K  796K pause/0    0:00  0.00%  0.00% csh
>     2 root      14    0     0K   40M crypto/3   0:00  0.00%  0.00% [cryptoret]
>   369 root      10    0     0K   40M nfsidl/0   0:00  0.00%  0.00% [nfsio]
>   213 root      10    0     0K   40M nfsidl/3   0:00  0.00%  0.00% [nfsio]
>   349 root      10    0     0K   40M nfsidl/0   0:00  0.00%  0.00% [nfsio]
>   344 root      10    0     0K   40M nfsidl/3   0:00  0.00%  0.00% [nfsio]
>     5 root      10    0     0K   40M pmsres/3   0:00  0.00%  0.00% [pms0]
>   653 root      10    0   220K  724K nanosl/3   0:00  0.00%  0.00% cron
>     1 root      10    0    60K  720K wait/3     0:00  0.00%  0.00% init
>   671 root       3    0   196K  824K ttyin/3    0:00  0.00%  0.00% csh
>   666 root       3    0    48K  700K ttyin/3    0:00  0.00%  0.00% getty
>   624 root       3    0    48K  700K ttyin/3    0:00  0.00%  0.00% getty

Interesting..

Do you know why the top process appears on CPU/3 when dmesg and the
top header agree that there is only CPU0 and CPU1?

Ben