Hi,

On 19 Mar 2002 at 13:35, Alexander Mueller wrote:
> > Well, almost.  NetBSD needs MP support, kthreads, and much better
> > desktop support before it can honestly be considered a competitor to
> > Linux, except for the simplest uniprocessor server machines, etc.
> 
> O.k., I guess you're right. Those are really NetBSD's weaknesses. At
> least MP support is being worked on (for some architectures). 

SMP support would be great. 

The question is, if it is wanted to compete with linux/windows 
on the desktop. From my experience ease of use equals loss of 
stability - nothing that I want.

mike