Subject: Re: PAM stinks
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
Date: 10/02/2001 19:54:15
> The mentioned installation could have used a standard text user-
Or, a standard db(3) file, even.
As for thumbprints,
Question 1: How will PAM allow login(1) to use biometrics, say a
retinal scanner, as part of authentication, by changing
code in only one place?
Now that you've answered Question 1, let's move on.
Question 2: How will changing code in this one spot allow the retinal
scanner to automatically work with POP3? How about netatalk?
Question 3: Okay, maybe I was being overly-ambitious. But, at least you
got the retinal scanner working with login(1), thanks to PAM.
Now, how about, when login(1) is invoked by telnetd instead
Like I said, PAM solves an ill-posed problem, and is therefore a
fundamentally broken architecture.