Subject: [Herb Peyerl ] NAT is coooool....
To: None <netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: netbsd-advocacy
Date: 03/24/1999 11:46:14
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 1999 16:46:17 -0000
	id CFE87182; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:46:14 -0500 (EST)
To: netbsd-advocacy@netbsd.org
Subject: [Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>] NAT is coooool....
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: message/rfc822
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: 24 Mar 1999 11:46:14 -0500
Message-ID: <87g16uzvhl.fsf@jekyll.piermont.com>
Lines: 28

Message-Id: <199903241359.GAA00998@beer.org>
To: current-users@netbsd.org
Subject: NAT is coooool....
From: Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@beer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 06:59:00 -0700

One of my web-servers needed to go behind a bit of a firewall mostly for
political and financial reasons that I won't get into... So I built a 
NAT box out of NetBSD-1.3I and put the webserver plus console server 
and database server behind it... I then redirected all port 80 connections
from the outside to the webserver on the inside and it's been running 
for about a week now with no problems... It's doing about 200,000 hits
per day and I expect this to increase...

On the NAT box I see:

	foo# ipnat -s
	mapped  in      11115095        out     14584506
	added   781757  expired 773785
	inuse   7375
	rules   5


mmmmm, NetBSD!