by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 1999 17:22:21 -0000
	by noc.untraceable.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/bonk!) id MAA09045;
	Thu, 18 Mar 1999 12:22:10 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 12:22:09 -0500
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
To: Mason Loring Bliss <mason@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>
Cc: netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Shell war, please move
Message-ID: <19990318122209.A9027@noc.untraceable.net>
Reply-To: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
References: <36EEAD03.5489AC6F@bk.bosch.de> <19990317001426.63647@fundy.ca> <36EF8BCB.6A2A7836@bk.bosch.de> <19990317192209.H426@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <19990317192209.H426@acheron.middleboro.ma.us>; from Mason Loring Bliss on Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 07:22:09PM -0500
Return-Receipt-To: receipts@daemon.org
Errors-To: errrors@graffiti.com

>> Well, depends on how you look at it. IMHO, it's not suitable for
>> current-users, as the topic has nothing to do with problems in
>> current, but rather how NetBSD should evolve.
>> My complain is that every non-techincal discussion ends up on
>> current-users,
>> which reduces the signal to noise ration extremly :-(
>
>How about netbsd-chat? Or are people sick of hearing me yap about it?

how about netbsd-holywars?  they might die out faster there...

or maybe what we really need is someone to just say "here...this is
how it's going to be."

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."