Subject: Re: big disk blues
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Allen Briggs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/02/1995 14:48:33
[ Sorry about the long time for this response--hopefully it's not all
moot by now. ]
> Sunday morning, I partitioned the disk with Silverlining and
> ran mkfs (from the Mac OS) on the root&usr filesystem. At
> the end, I got an error which was something like:
> cg 0: bad magic number
Ugh... This is probably because the disk is too big, but I'm not sure.
> Newfs said it was 103, and
> mkfs said it was 118, which agrees with Silverlining and the
> manufacturer's data.
I don't know why the two are different. I think that NetBSD calculates
it whereas the MacOS utilities query the drive.
> So now that I had my root&usr filesystem on the big disk, I
> decided to install NetBSD. I ran the install utility and
> selected the SCSI # and I got an error that was something
> bad dir: ino 2
Yeah... newfs under NetBSD creates ufs level 2 file systems. The MacOS
utilities create and understand level 1 file systems. I don't know all
the differences, but they are not compatible...
> Did I do something wrong, or is this a limitation of the
> installation utility?
You did nothing wrong. It's the installer's fault.
I hope to fix this before the next release.
> I realize this is because I have the swap space on sd1b
> instead of on sd0b. My question is, will this adversely
> affect performance?
I don't _think_ it will affect anything adversely. You
might want to recompile a kernel that explicitly puts the
primary swap on sd1b, though.
Allen Briggs - end killing - email@example.com ** MacBSD == NetBSD/mac68k **