Re: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00

To: Matt Johnston <matt%ucc.asn.au@localhost>
Subject: Re: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00
From: nisse%lysator.liu.se@localhost (Niels Möller)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:14:37 +0100

Matt Johnston <matt%ucc.asn.au@localhost> writes:

> Why not keep just ext_info_{c,s} and specify that client and server
> both MUST send SSH_MSG_EXT_INFO immediately after SSH_NEWKEYS iff both
> sent ext_info_{c,s}? Then they both know what to expect.

Sounds ok to me.

Regards,
/Niels

-- 
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.

References:
- Re: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00
  - From: denis bider
- Re: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00
  - From: Niels Möller
- Re: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00
  - From: Matt Johnston

Prev by Date: RE: DH group exchange (Re: SSH key algorithm updates)
Next by Date: Re: DH group exchange (Re: SSH key algorithm updates)
Previous by Thread: Re: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00
Next by Thread: RE: Feedback on draft-ssh-ext-info-00
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index