Subject: Re: mprotect(2) strange behaviour under compat linux
To: Nicolas Joly <email@example.com>
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/18/2007 18:14:51
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:40:27AM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> Intrumenting uvm_fault.c show that protections are correct (check_prot
> = 0x2), but something (memset ?) is trying to access this area for
> reading (access_type = 0x1) ...
> Could this be a bug in memset from suse 10.0 glibc (from
> pkgsrc/emulators/suse100_base) ?
It actually seems likely that someone is assuming that PROT_WRITE
Actually, since the i386 (and probably the later parts) don't
support 'write only' mappings, maybe the compat netbsd32 mmap
should enforce read access if write access is requested.
David Laight: email@example.com