Subject: Re: COMPAT_NETBSD32 [was Re: Upgrading to different port]
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 12/14/2007 21:55:03
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Gary Thorpe <email@example.com> wrote:
>--- Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:08:47PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>> > About a week ago I ws going to upgrade my system from Oct 4 current
>> > current current. Suddenly the CVS updates exploded so I decided to
>> > hold off until things settled down. Is it a reasonably safe time
>> > to upgrade? I understand all the caveats with running current so I
>> > just looking for known instabilities.
>> > Also, I am running i386 on an AMD64 box because I needed
>> > It seems that that is now supported on amd64 so I was going to go
>> > that port as well. Can I just unpack the sets over an existing
>> > installation or are there deeper changes needed?
>> I've done this on one or 2 devel system, and it did go relatively
>> I'd recommend booting an INSTALL kernel with embeded ramdisk and use
>> sysinst to do the upgrade though; switching the currently running
>> may have unexpected issues (I just dropped an INSTALL kernel in / and
>> booted it)
>Isn't amd64 supposed to be able to support running 32-bit i386 binaries
>with COMPAT_NETBSD32 or it just not working in current right now?
You need to install the 32 bit libraries in /emul/netbsd32 first.
>It seems like it would be better to leave most applications as 32-bit
>that don't require 64-bit capabilities (OpenOffice seems like a good
>candidate for this unless you need large file/memory handling?).
I think that in the amd64 case 64 bit applications end up running
faster because the compiler can make use of the extra registers.