Subject: Re: -current not building: lfs_rfw.c
From: Hisashi T Fujinaka <email@example.com>
Date: 12/12/2007 10:10:09
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:06:40 +0100
> Quentin Garnier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:42:55AM +0000, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:27:58 +0100
>>> Quentin Garnier <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:48:40AM +0000, Steven M. Bellovin
>>>>> This is with up-to-date source and a clean build tree.
>>>> What exactly do you call a "clean build tree"? The error you get
>>>> is because you haven't re-run config(1), so we don't appear to
>>>> share the definition for that.
>>> I meant that I removed /usr/BUILD/obj, to avoid stale dependencies,
>>> etc. Everything was built via build.sh, which I thought did run
>>> config. Here's the start of the build log:
>> Well, either sys/ufs/files.ufs (should be 1.17) is not up-to-date for
>> some reason, or you've added options LFS_KERNEL_RFW to your kernel
>> config in-between.
> Neither is true...
> I'll try Elad's patch.
I had the same problem and I think that anoncvs isn't syncing as
reliably as I used to expect.
Hisashi T Fujinaka - firstname.lastname@example.org
BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte