Subject: Re: USE_SSP
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/29/2007 21:35:32
In article <20070929201703.GA11070@panix.com>,
Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:09:37PM +0200, Juan RP wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:05:48 -0400
>> Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > I don't think this is how it's _supposed_ to be. Are we talking about
>> > netbsd-4 or -current? If the former, xtos' patch to pull up the USE_SSP/
>> > USE_FORT support might be broken. If the latter, there is probably a
>> > mistake in my changes that reorganized the USE_SSP support and added
>> > USE_FORT.
>> > USE_FORT just builds userland code with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, which is
>> > not presently useful for the kernel.
>> Take a look at sys/conf/Makefile.kern.inc:
>Looking at the output of 'cvs annotate', I changed that, and it's a
>bug. It should be USE_SSP there. (Does anyone see a reason why not?)
I think it should be USE_SSP.