Subject: Re: USE_SSP
To: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com>
Date: 09/29/2007 16:05:48
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 12:25:55AM +0200, Juan RP wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:23:58 -0600
> "John R. Shannon" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > What does USE_SSP=YES do now? It does not compile the kernel with
> > -fstack-protector
> USE_FORT is the one to build a kernel with -fstack-protector.
I don't think this is how it's _supposed_ to be. Are we talking about
netbsd-4 or -current? If the former, xtos' patch to pull up the USE_SSP/
USE_FORT support might be broken. If the latter, there is probably a
mistake in my changes that reorganized the USE_SSP support and added
USE_FORT just builds userland code with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, which is
not presently useful for the kernel.