On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:42:08PM -0700, Darren Reed wrote:
> Andrew Doran wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >
> >> It would be interesting if you could include x86 Solaris in future
> >> benchmarks.
> >
> >It would be a brighter place if you stopped pushing people around and
> >weren't such a deadweight. How about you benchmark it?
> >  
> 
> Andrew, there's a lot of merit in including Solaris10/OpenSolaris 
> benchmarks in the result as that's where a lot of big databases run
> today...numbers from [Open]Solaris are much more relevant in this
> type of measure than OpenBSD - they're only relevant
> if we want to see want NetBSD 2.0 or older was like.

Darren, thats maybe a reason for a benchmark and not how Perry did ask
in his usual way (I can understand Andrews response).

Andrew, thank you very much for all the work you are doing here.

Regards,
Bernd