Subject: Re: dhcpd
To: Greg Troxel <email@example.com>
From: Tom Spindler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/12/2007 22:24:13
> The real incompatible change is in -current but not 4, and -current has
> binary compat with the old ioctl of smaller size. Binary compatibility
> with the old version of SIOCGIFCONF in currrent, with the larger size
> and the bizarre size-dependent behavior doesn't make sense, and would
> cause the other half of the programs to fail (well, right now we have
> dhcp vs racoon and I don't know about others).
If this is the case, shouldn't the SIOCGIFCONF ioctl number be bumped?