Subject: Re: ataraid(4) vs. raidframe(4) (was: Re: ICH SMBus driver (from
To: None <>
From: Juan RP <>
List: current-users
Date: 07/23/2007 20:27:38
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:23:55 -0500
"Jonathan A. Kollasch" <> wrote:

> So, how is ataraid(4) better (or worse) than raidframe(4)?

Using ataraid(4) means that a ld(4) will be used as device, so that
you don't have to use raidframe because the software raid set up
in the firmware will be detected.

Juan Romero Pardines 	- The NetBSD Project 	- NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish