Subject: Re: usermount semantics changed... Why?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Peter Seebach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/10/2007 11:39:17
In message <email@example.com>, Juan RP writes:
>I don't know the reason why those were made the default for non-root,
>but there's some mention about it in mount(8)... at least in -current.
On my system, at least, it's not that they're the default -- it's that
they're *not* the default, but without them, mount fails with EPERM.
But my system's a month or two out of date, I think. Kernel May 10.