Subject: si_value member missing in AIO support?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Scott Ellis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/20/2007 09:51:21
In building the latest Samba, and attempting to use its AIO support (now
that -current has it), I ran into the issue that Samba expects there to
be an si_value member of siginfo. I'm not entirely sure if this is
mandatory or optional, but it seems that FreeBSD has it.
Is this an oversight in NetBSD, or does si_value (specifically
si_value.sival_int) map to something else?