Subject: Re: dump_lfs issue
To: Konrad Schroder <email@example.com>
From: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/01/2007 02:43:55
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Konrad Schroder <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Marcin Michal Jessa wrote:
> > On 5/1/07, Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Yeah... it should find the LFS partition, at least on my test seems to
> >> work fine:
> I could be wrong about this, but it would appear from the source (and
> your example) that scan_ffs will not give the address of the superblock
> relative to the partition, but attempts to infer the address of the
> partition from the superblock(s) it finds on the raw disk. So the number
> it reports will be off by 16. Still better than the shell script I
> posted :^) but it seems important to understand the limitations.
You are not wrong. Do you mean that the offset value reported by
scan_ffs, will be off by 16?
Or are you talking about the sector number for the superblock?
Juan RP's blog - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish