Subject: Re: Should tap(4) and etherip(4) really clutter dmesg?
To: Nino Dehne <ndehne@gmail.com>
From: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
List: current-users
Date: 02/27/2007 00:50:46
--I8IZ0kuavpqFQN/k
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:42:36AM +0100, Quentin Garnier wrote:
[...]
> What you say makes perfect sense;  I'll remove the first line from tap
> output and aprint_verbose-ify the other.

By the way, making it use aprint_verbose means it will not pollute dmesg
any longer, but that will still appear in the logs, which I don't see as
a bad thing.

(Granted, what'd be cool is to be able to set the tap's MAC address
before it is created.  Oh, well.)

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks
Owe it to yourself not to fail"
Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.

--I8IZ0kuavpqFQN/k
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBReNyVtgoQloHrPnoAQIaNAf/UOWfXOGiKrBrmO2vfNDwSezSpAcrBQqy
82hFmmIYDD7dEC0VQzVU8TTGwkKvZaPkEOLzYaelNzmmpyUkBROYZ8S+iUY6/312
+2P6PjS3Dz42dp249pP+aKl+vrHHgQ/90UqQr4u3tTzp7tGhHn+P9DO9HeIiAKg8
1YBFOwnNIdi2/XjCzev+t+ZvTU+5by64W1wKK9uZ0xMyZ+pwJ07sAhqSvoW7R5yC
Rvp2iY3ttf5Ezzf1k63xWSmIJviTYo1LBlTL5UZdNVfIcVTf42q7cwnIn8gat5nU
dBpzA1Q2D/0vmHK1jZdoZEa0MuVsYr0tVIPUZDacO4xpcFhfd7k78g==
=Ghj/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--I8IZ0kuavpqFQN/k--