On Sat Feb 24 2007 at 15:00:43 +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > On Sat Feb 24 2007 at 12:04:36 +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > > I have procfs mounted on /proc, without "-o linux".  According to
> > > the mount_procfs man page, there should not be any "exe" symlinks
> > > if the 'linux" option is not used, but in reality there are "exe"
> > > symlinks.  A few of the "exe" symlinks are correct, but most just
> > > point to "/".
> >
> > Which vintage are you running?  Did you try the very latest -current?
> 
> 4.99.12; -current as of 2007-02-21 18:00 UTC.  Do you think that changes
> in the past three days might have helped?

No.  I'll have a look tonight once I get -current up unless someone
beats me to it.

-- 
Antti Kantee <pooka@iki.fi>                     Of course he runs NetBSD
http://www.iki.fi/pooka/                          http://www.NetBSD.org/
    "la qualité la plus indispensable du cuisinier est l'exactitude"