Subject: Re: Interest in Broadcom crypto cards?
To: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Thomas E. Spanjaard <email@example.com>
Date: 02/20/2007 16:29:37
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Todd Vierling wrote:
> On 2/20/07, Thomas E. Spanjaard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I'm left wondering what use PCI64/66 is there then? Sure, there are SoCs
>> with PCI64/66 buses (Intel/Marvell?), but I haven't seen any solution
>> where they offer that as PCI slot, save a couple of development boards.
>> Is that perhaps what you're referring to?
> For a card with a bus interface of that type, I'd hope that the card
> is typical PCI64 in that it will work properly in 3.3V PCI32 slots.
Or better yet, if it's universal, 5V as well.
> That aside, yes, I would expect that some embedded systems will start
> to grow 64-bit PCI over the next few years, but it seems a bit further
> off before we see Intel or AMD pushing the power consumption of their
> high-end CPUs really far down. (Yeah, batteries in the newer dual
> core laptops are suffering, but "who cares" in their eyes? ;)
I expect them to switch to PCIe, as that has the added bonus of less
wiring to cater for on your PCBs. The newer Intel IOPs have PCIe links
besides a PCI-X bus as well, iirc.
Thomas E. Spanjaard
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----